Ann Romney Doesn't Understand Poverty; Poverty is More Than Tuna and Pasta
I was what is sometimes called "voluntarily poor." I could have 
gone home to my parents, where a guest bedroom awaited. I probably could have 
hit up some relative for a short-term loan. What 
mattered most, however, was that I was in college. I would graduate someday, get 
a job, a wife, 21 / 2 kids, a split-level in the suburbs and live the 
conventional Americandream. I was 
not stuck. I was on my way.
Ann and Mitt Romney had similar days. In her speech to the 
Republican National Convention, Ann referred to 
those timesof jolly penury. "We were very young. Both 
still in college. There were many reasons to delay marriage, and you know what? 
We just didn’t care. We got married and moved into a basement apartment. We 
walked to class together, shared the housekeeping, ate a lot of pasta and tuna 
fish. Our desk was a door propped up on sawhorses. Our dining-room table was a 
fold-down ironing boardin 
the kitchen. But those were the best days." Oh, what fun to be poor!
Of course, Mitt was the son of an autocompany CEO who became governor of Michigan and Ann had gone to 
the tony Kingswood School(since merged with 
Cranbrook) where the present-day tuition is $28,300 for day students and $38,900 
for boarders. They were both rich — if not in great wealth, then in promise. They were, in fact, living on the American 
Motors Corp. stockMitt’s father, 
George Romney, had given them.
The theme of Ann Romney’s speech — we are like you— 
resonates through U.S. politics. It was sounded at the conventions not just by 
Ann Romney but also by Joe Biden, 
Chris Christieand Michelle Obama. They all either disinterred impoverished ancestors or harked 
back to their own days of voluntary poverty. Michelle Obama recalled that Barack 
used to pick her up "in a carthat was so rusted out, 
I could actually see the pavement going by in a hole in the passenger-side 
door." Of course, the couple in that car had both graduated from Harvard Law, 
but Barack Obama forsook a lucrative law career and plunged into community 
organization.
Romney, in contrast, plunged into finance. So the onus was on 
Ann to show that Mitt could connect. She swung and she missed. Poverty, after 
all, is not about bookcases made of planks and bricks but about utter 
hopelessness. The poor do not have affluent parents. The poor do not have 
college degrees. The poor often do not even have high school 
degrees. The poor often don’t have a man in the 
houseor, to be perfectly 
frank, sometimes the discipline and work habits to lift themselves out of 
poverty.
The 
United States now is busy shrinking its middle class. The homes of millions of 
people have been plunged underwater. Jobs have been offshored and unions have 
been weakened so that wages are lower, hours longer and job security a virtual 
oxymoron. What is it like to be 50 and suddenly out of work? What is it like to 
send out your 100th or 500th résumé? What is it like to spend your savings on 
long-term medical care so that you get reduced to poverty?
Not 
for a second did I think that Ann Romney got it. This has nothing to do with 
wealth. After all, the Kennedys were rich. So were the Roosevelts. Someone who 
appreciated the plight of the poor would not have trivialized it with campy 
stories from her let’s-pretend past. The challenge is not the isolated person 
who has fallen on hard times who Mitt and Ann have helped — I applaud that! — 
but the utterly impoverished, the erstwhile homeowner, the financially 
precarious old and those who have flunked out of the middle class. They too have 
stories about eating off an ironing board and stuffing themselves with pasta and 
tuna fish. Only it’s not about the past, but about the present and, worse, the 
future.
Article Source: http://www.afroarticles.com/article-dashboard
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment